Our requested for a higher floor and quiet room at the time of booking were all fullfilled. The room was much bigger than I expected. The staff are friendly and helpful. The doorman helped me booked a shuttle to the airport. The location is very good, and the price is inexpensive and affordable. I would say it's a good deal! The only negative ...
1 of 1 Yahoo! Users found this review helpful
SHOW FULL REVIEW
OVERALL
Service
Cleanliness
Location
Value
Great Time once again!
By A Yahoo! Contributor, 03/13/09
Myself and my husband have not long returned from The Warwick New York Hotel after our second Visit.We had once again a fantastic time.The hotel is lovely,Very Clean,Cosy and all you need.The staff are so welcoming and we would like to a special thank to Goerge,Jack,Edgar,Jose,Tom,Sam,HameL,Bob,Rury and not forgetting Laura.We were well looked after by them all.We look forward to retuning to see them all again in the near future,Well recommended.
1 of 1 Yahoo! Users found this review helpful
OVERALL
Service
Cleanliness
Location
Value
Worth It
By A Yahoo! Contributor, 11/05/08
I don´t think that there is another hotel in NY that gives you such a big room for no more than 400$. Excellent service, its a bit old but no decadence but stylish. Perfect situation, just one block from the subway to dowtown, to 5th avenue, 4 blocks from times square and central park.
Without a doubt I would come back to this hotel.
OVERALL
Service
Cleanliness
Location
Value
Lived Up To It's 4-Star Rating
By A Yahoo! Contributor, 08/04/08
My 3-night stay at the New York Warwick was far and above my expectations, and I am a skeptic. This 83-year old hotel is beautifully decorated in the period in which it was first built, including mahogony furniture and marble bathroom, elegant draperies and sculpted carpet. The housekeeping was also more than I expected. After a day of touring ...
SHOW FULL REVIEW
OVERALL
Service
Cleanliness
Location
Value
excellant
By A Yahoo! Contributor, 11/27/07
Just came back from 5 nights in NYC staying at the Warwick 25/11/07. Wonderful hotel, everything about it. A large hotel with a small homly feeling. Great location, rooms large and comfy, beds you could die for, my daughter said it was like sleeping on a cloud. The elevators were small and slow - so what. The rooms were a little noisy i think it ...
SHOW FULL REVIEW
OVERALL
Service
Cleanliness
Location
Value
Excellent hote.!
By A Yahoo! Contributor, 08/20/07
The Warwick Hotel was the perfect spot to stay on our recent vacation. The room was luxurious with everything one needed, the location was an easy walk to many sights, the staff was very polite and more than helpful, and the price was right. I would definitely book at the Warwick on any return trip to New York!
...but the rooms were a bit tight. Good thing you're in NY so who stays in the hotel room more than to grab enough sleep so as to function the next day? No one. Updated bathrooms a plus, and wireless internet service is an easy upgrade (for biz travelers).
OVERALL
Not worth the money
By A Yahoo! Contributor, 03/23/07
We were recently in NYC for a conference, the Hilton was the host hotel, but was booked. The Warwick was across the street so it was convenient, the price changed several times during our booking process, until it ended up being $100 more per night than the Hilton. For $350 per night, the carpet was stained, and the room did not have any extra ...
3 of 4 Yahoo! Users found this review helpful
SHOW FULL REVIEW
OVERALL
Service
Cleanliness
Location
Value
bad service
By A Yahoo! Contributor, 11/24/06
We dropped by the bar for drinks and snacks and sat there for 15 minutes without service. I complained to the bartender who informed me that it was not his job. We found a more better bar in a nearby location.
We would definitely recommend the Warwick. Fabulous location - close to theater district, Central Park, and shopping on the avenues and severa subway stops. We were upgraded from a king to a double and the room was very large. Charming and sparkling clean. There are not any hotels in NYC that are a value but for the location this seemed to be a ...